Author Topic: Anaheim sucks (Read 5004 times)

Ryan · « **on:** April 21, 2006, 09:32:42 PM »

After the ticket frenzy today for the Flames game, I thought I would see what it is like in the sunnier south. Apparently nobody cares, I can buy 8 tickets, and only cause they limit you to 8 per household, or I bet I could have got like 50. Losers...

Mikal · « **Reply #1 on:** April 21, 2006, 09:39:26 PM »

You should buy them and try and sell them to Flames fans that are dumb... HA

Ryan · « **Reply #2 on:** April 21, 2006, 09:41:48 PM »

And check out the view, so close. And man, do those seats like comfy!

Skywalker · « **Reply #3 on:** April 21, 2006, 10:09:50 PM »

Frig... they're cheap too! For that price we could fly down with Westjet, go to the game, get in some fights, and fly back home for just a little more than what a Saddledome ticket would cost.

Drew · « **Reply #4 on:** April 21, 2006, 10:34:23 PM »

Hell I'd get so much utility from beating up Anahiem fans that I would actually make a profit on the trip.

Ryan · « **Reply #5 on:** April 21, 2006, 11:15:21 PM »

Lol, I can't believe you used utility in an everyday context. I'm so impressed.

Skywalker · « **Reply #6 on:** April 21, 2006, 11:53:59 PM »

Ha ha ha... yay economics! It's funny because I find phrases like marginal utility, deadweight loss, and pareto optimal finding their way into my everyday vocabulary. Scary!

Ryan · « **Reply #7 on:** April 22, 2006, 01:00:33 AM »

I assume that pareto optimal has something to do with the pareto distribution? Perhaps pertaining to losses or something like that?

Skywalker · « **Reply #8 on:** April 22, 2006, 06:09:05 AM »

No, pareto optimal is an equilibrium condition in game theory where no single agent can be made better off without making another agent worse off... even if the result would mean a gain in the total utility of all agents.

Anyways... back to the flames. Here is a sweet motivational video from the 80's "Can't stop a flame when it's red hot"

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6...45791&q=calgary

Drew · « **Reply #9 on:** April 22, 2006, 04:06:29 PM »

Text book definition Shad. God my economics is slowly being forced out by other crap. Gah, hearsay, joinder, constructive trusts. Get out of my head!

Colezy · « **Reply #10 on:** April 22, 2006, 05:03:59 PM »

Quote from: Skywalker

No, pareto optimal is an equilibrium condition in game theory where no single agent can be made better off without making another agent worse off... even if the result would mean a gain in the total utility of all agents.

what the fuck people stop it this is not an educational thread or website if anything it is an anti educational website you lucky you through that cheesy 80s flames shit in or I would have kicked your ass

Drew · « **Reply #11 on:** April 22, 2006, 11:03:21 PM »

I want to learn more!

Aquabat · « **Reply #12 on:** April 24, 2006, 11:40:08 PM »

Skywalker is so wise in the ways of the force, and apprently the force is comprised of supply,demand and elasticity.

Skywalker · « **Reply #13 on:** April 25, 2006, 01:17:09 AM »

May the indifference curves be with you...

enndogger · « **Reply #14 on:** April 25, 2006, 03:27:56 AM »

Quote from: Skywalker

May the indifference curves be with you...

Oh god! I can't wait until your done school. lol

Your back thursday, right?!? Lets all go out and watch the game / kill off some brain cells.